This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFC] PR middle-end/179 gcc -O2 -Wuninitialized missing warning with &var
2008/8/11 Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>:
>>
>> I am excluding everything that is not completely relevant to the
>> testcase I posted above. If I could exclude further, I will. The goal
>> is to increment the scope of the warning iteratively in further
>> patches.
>
> Well, I still think it is a bad idea to stick in code that seems
> pointless to the reader ;) If there is a testcase the reader can
> check by removing the case and he'll see a failing testcase -- if
> not he has to assume "black magic" (as I do now).
>
I agree. All this is definitely "black magic" for me!! And I was not
going to commit this patch just yet. ;-)
I will try to generate the testcases or I will ask here for help if I cannot.
Cheers,
Manuel.