This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, Fortran] Derived-type finalization, split up: module.c part

From: "Paul Richard Thomas" <paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com>
To: "Daniel Kraft" <d at domob dot eu>
Cc: "Fortran List" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 14:53:36 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran] Derived-type finalization, split up: module.c part
References: <4896F78B.9000009@domob.eu> <339c37f20808050153s77fa5110jec3ed4064f86284@mail.gmail.com> <48982036.4050102@domob.eu>

Daniel,


> We call gfc_free_namespace in gfc_free_symbol; that should do the trick,
> shouldn't it?

Yes, indeed.  I did not check gfc_finalizers' clening up - is that clean?

Cheers

Paul

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch, Fortran] Derived-type finalization, split up: module.c part
  - From: Daniel Kraft

References:
- [Patch, Fortran] Derived-type finalization, split up: module.c part
  - From: Daniel Kraft
- Re: [Patch, Fortran] Derived-type finalization, split up: module.c part
  - From: Paul Richard Thomas
- Re: [Patch, Fortran] Derived-type finalization, split up: module.c part
  - From: Daniel Kraft

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]