This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: patches from the graphite branch for review


I don't know yet how that code could be factored.  I will work on a
fix after the graphite merge.

Don't worry -- more of a self-note than anything else.

I think you shouldn't revert the patch to support in-tree Cloog and PPL. Â I
looked at it, and even if it doesn't work I think it is better to have it
than not.


I reverted my revert ;-), but still I don't know why the in-source
build of PPL does not work.  I can investigate this next week.

I think that, because PPL is being built as a static lib, you have to explicitly link GCC with -lstdc++. Just add it to ppllibs in the toplevel configure. In fact, without this change to your http://cri.ensmp.fr/people/pop/gcc/1142_build.diff patch, graphite would fail to compile wherever PPL was built statically.

(Static linking support is one more reason to fix the in-tree build!)

Paolo

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]