This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Antwort: [wwwdocs] Add unit-at-a-time entry
- From: Markus Milleder <markus dot milleder at generali dot at>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:16:49 +0200
- Subject: Antwort: [wwwdocs] Add unit-at-a-time entry
I have a spelling nit and I want to ask for a slight change of wording.
Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> schrieb am 25.07.2008 13:53:40:
> Index: changes.html
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.4/changes.html,v
> retrieving revision 1.19
> diff -u -r1.19 changes.html
> --- changes.html 23 Jul 2008 10:28:32 -0000 1.19
> +++ changes.html 25 Jul 2008 11:52:10 -0000
> @@ -83,6 +83,10 @@
> These utilities have not been installed by default since GCC
> 3.0.</li>
>
> + <li><code>-fno-unit-at-a-time</code> code has been
> + removed from GCC. The command line option is still accepted
> + and imply <code>-fno-toplevel-reorder</code> and
implies
> + <code>-fno-section-anchors</code>.</li>
> </ul>
>
> <h2>General Optimizer Improvements</h2>
> @@ -135,6 +139,12 @@
> </ul>
>
> <h3>Java (GCJ)</h3>
> + <ul>
> + <li>Java now enable unit-at-a-time compilation by default. This enables
> + more aggressive optimization, in particular inlining decisions. The
> + memory consumption of compiling large <code>jar</code> archives might
will grow
I guess it's highly unlikely that it will shrink or even stay the same for any
jar.
> + grow and require splitting those archives to smaller units.</li>
> + </ul>
>
> <h2>New Targets and Target Specific Improvements</h2>
>
>