This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
- From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1 at t-online dot de>, Jie Zhang <jzhang918 at gmail dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, rdsandiford at googlemail dot com
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:33:48 +0200
- Subject: Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
- References: <474C9B33.8060503@t-online.de> <474C9CBD.2070708@codesourcery.com> <87fxyqdc45.fsf@firetop.home> <474D943C.4030106@codesourcery.com> <877ik0aerh.fsf@firetop.home> <482CA836.6050801@t-online.de> <878wybdwu7.fsf@firetop.home> <482CBFD9.3050201@t-online.de> <482CC108.3000303@codesourcery.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805160004590.8808@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-05/msg00948.html>
* Joseph S. Myers wrote on Fri, May 16, 2008 at 02:05:35AM CEST:
> On Thu, 15 May 2008, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> > Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> >
> > > I've now checked in the libstdc++-v3 patch, which is a reasonably obvious
> > > bug fix. I've never had an opinion on whether other targets ought to fail
> > > link tests, hence I'm not really interested in pursuing the other part of
> > > the patch. I'll leave that to you or Mark, if you wish.
> >
> > I think the libstdc++-v3 change is indeed pretty obvious.
>
> As I understand it, it's also a regression fix that should go on 4.3
> branch as well.
This has not happened yet. Is there anything holding it up?
Also, I've been kind of wondering. AC_LIBTOOL_DLOPEN is also used in
libgfortran and libmudflap; the latter has no GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES though.
Do these directories never get built on newlib targets?
Thanks,
Ralf