This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [trunk][patch] gimplify type sizes in a pointer type
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 13:12, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "Diego" == Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com> writes:
>
> Diego> I can't think of a counter example where we can still have
> Diego> unfinished types at the end. I'm no FE expert, though.
>
> Sounds like an opportunity to tighten down what gimplification will
> accept. Even in the last year there have been a few disagreements
> about the meaning of various trees ... I find this somewhat dismaying.
Agreed. I think this is a good idea as well. Aborting in these cases
should indicate places where the FE needs fixing. Which is what's
going to happen when this patch goes in.
Diego.