This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] The Integrated Register Allocator

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 09:37:42 +0200
Subject: Re: [RFA] The Integrated Register Allocator
References: <47F1A9D4.1010100@redhat.com>

On gcc torture tests there is one additional regression for x86_64 and
one for ppc64 in comparison with the trunk.  These two regressions are
not critical: some particular code generation is expected.  The code
is different with IRA usage but it is still correct.  I'll see what
can I do with the tests.

I think it's best if you make these tests use IRA, hoping that it becomes the default more sooner than later.

How are the compile times?

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA] The Integrated Register Allocator
  - From: Vladimir Makarov

References:
- [RFA] The Integrated Register Allocator
  - From: Vladimir Makarov

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]