This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH]: cleanup for conversion exprs code patterns (1/16)

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Tomas Bily <tomby at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, tomby at ucw dot cz, tbily at suse dot cz
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:22:00 -0600
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: cleanup for conversion exprs code patterns (1/16)
References: <20080331144912.C402CF00AB@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <m363v26c0l.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803312008560.20196@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Reply-to: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>

>>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph S Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> writes:

>> Did you consider just getting rid of the duplication?

Joseph> I think of these patches as an intermediate step to removing
Joseph> the duplication.

That sounds good to me, provided this actually is an intermediate step.
That isn't clear to me.

Joseph> Separating mechanical patches like this that should not change
Joseph> compiler behavior at all from any patches to places where the
Joseph> compiler *does* distinguish the two tree codes (which need
Joseph> individual analysis) seems a very good idea to me.

Me too.

Tom

References:
- [PATCH]: cleanup for conversion exprs code patterns (1/16)
  - From: Tomas Bily
- Re: [PATCH]: cleanup for conversion exprs code patterns (1/16)
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [PATCH]: cleanup for conversion exprs code patterns (1/16)
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]