This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Revised: utf-16 and utf-32 support in C and C++
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Kris Van Hees <kris dot van dot hees at oracle dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 02:08:22 +0000 (UTC)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revised: utf-16 and utf-32 support in C and C++
- References: <20080325124715.GJ19427@oracle.com> <20080325195700.GK19427@oracle.com>
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Kris Van Hees wrote:
> Would it be preferable to just not support additional concatenations like
> this (to avoid the complication altogether), or is target specific behaviour
> acceptable in cases like this?
I think it's best just to support the standard concatenations. (If the
C++ draft supports any concatenations not in the C TR 19769, it would be
reasonable to support those extra concatenations in C as well.)
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com