This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tuples] walk_gimple_stmt: handle WCE


On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 16:55, Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com> wrote:
> The following patch handles walking of GIMPLE_WITH_CLEANUP_EXPRs.  It
>  looks like a minor oversight when we added WCE tuples.

Thanks.

>  Diego, we can also collapse GIMPLE_OMP_FOR, but I'm not sure whether
>  it is semantically safe to walk the PRE_BODY before the OMP_BODY.  Can I
>  walk the PRE_BODY, and fall through for the GIMPLE_OMP_FOR code?

Yes, walking the PRE_BODY first makes perfect sense.


Diego.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]