This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PING H.J. Lu] Re: [PATCH] PR35371 GCSE loses track of REG_POINTER attribute


On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:32:13AM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 17:08 -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
> > HJ,
> > 
> > Given the x86/x86_64 issues with the last indexed load/store patch,
> > can you SPEC test this patch to make sure the rtlanal.c change doesn't
> > affect you?  Thanks.
> 
> HJ,
> 
> If you get a chance, can you please SPEC test the patch located in:
> 
>     http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg01442.html
> 
> just to make sure it doesn't have a negative impact on x86/x86_64?
> Thanks.

Hi Peter,

I can use gcc to compile SPEC CPU now. But your patch won't apply

patching file rtlanal.c
patching file gcse.c
Hunk #2 succeeded at 4463 (offset 7 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 6120 (offset 7 lines).
patching file emit-rtl.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 

against revision 133140. Do you have an updated patch?

Thanks.

H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]