This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[PING H.J. Lu] Re: [PATCH] PR35371 GCSE loses track of REG_POINTER attribute
- From: Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet dot ibm dot com>
- To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Cc: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at nildram dot co dot uk>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:32:13 -0500
- Subject: [PING H.J. Lu] Re: [PATCH] PR35371 GCSE loses track of REG_POINTER attribute
- References: <20080225222624.GA26857@vervain.rchland.ibm.com> <87skzfzkvh.fsf@firetop.home> <1204052325.7014.2.camel@otta> <47C467BA.1090308@redhat.com> <1204240130.7376.16.camel@otta>
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 17:08 -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
> HJ,
>
> Given the x86/x86_64 issues with the last indexed load/store patch,
> can you SPEC test this patch to make sure the rtlanal.c change doesn't
> affect you? Thanks.
HJ,
If you get a chance, can you please SPEC test the patch located in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg01442.html
just to make sure it doesn't have a negative impact on x86/x86_64?
Thanks.
Peter