This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Renaming IS_AGGR_TYPE & co

Paolo Carlini wrote:
Mark Mitchell wrote:
Thank you for volunteering to working on this. 
You are welcome. Many thanks for your help, I'm almost done. I have only
one remaining doubt (in init.c):


should aggr (aggregate) just become class? And it's ok to replace
IS_AGGR_TYPE with MAYBE_CLASS_TYPE_P or should be just CLASS_TYPE_P?

In all three uses of that function, we want a class type, AFAICT. So, I would change the function to be is_class_type and use CLASS_TYPE_P as the predicate in the test.

Thanks,

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]