This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Updated baseline_symbols.txt


Jakub Jelinek schrieb:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 12:48:04AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Built gcc-4_3-branch revision 132801 as a (patched) package for
>> Debian; test results are available on gcc-testresults (sorry, I can't
>> currently provide results for pure upstream builds).  The baseline
>> symbols for i486, x86_64, powerpc do match the current symbols on the
>> branch.  Attached are the diffs for alpha, hppa, ia64, mips, s390,
>> sparc. The diffs for alpha, hppa, s390, sparc are regressions from the
>> files currently checked in; compared to the 4.1 version these look ok.
>> I'm CCing port maintainers; I'd appreciate feedback if these are real
>> problems, if the new symbol files should be checked in, or if these
>> should be removed.
> 
> Thanks for doing this.
> 
> s390, ia64, mips and sparc baseline_symbols.txt changes look fine
> (on s390 and sparc addition of 283 entries with *_LDBL_* symvers which
> match the 283 *_LDBL_* entries in powerpc-linux-gnu, except some occassional
> s/m/j/ etc. differences - always did diff between that arch and ppc),
> 121 new entries with GLIBCXX_3.4.([6789]|10)|CXXABI_1.3.2 symvers
> which match those for powerpc-linux-gnu resp. x86_64-linux-gnu
> (again, eyeballed diff) and optionally changes of the math
> *l@@GLIBCXX_3.4* exports to *l@GLIBCXX_3.4*.  So those are fine.

these are attached in the s390-ia64-mips-sparc.diff.gz:

2008-03-07  Matthias Klose  <doko@ubuntu.com>

        * config/abi/post/s390-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt: Update.
        * config/abi/post/ia64-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt: Likewise.
        * config/abi/post/mips-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt: Likewise.
        * config/abi/post/sparc-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt: Likewise.

ok for the branch and the trunk?

> alpha seems to be problematic, it removes over 2000 entries, that can't be
> right and certainly shouldn't be checked that way.

No feedback yet from Debian port maintainers.

> Has hppa-linux also changed the long double size, or why those has been not
> found by configure before and now they are?  You could ressurrect the math
> exports as *l@GLIBCXX_* instead of *l@@GLIBCXX_* by tweaking the #ifdef
> above _GLIBCXX_MATHL_WRAPPER definition in compatibility.cc - change that
> #ifdef _GLIBCXX_LONG_DOUBLE_COMPAT
> to
> #if defined (_GLIBCXX_LONG_DOUBLE_COMPAT) || (defined (__hppa__) && defined (__linux__))
> or whatever Benjamin prefers (of course the primary thing is to find out
> what changed).  No idea why __signbitl is popping up, it shouldn't be
> exported.

I'll let Benjamin comment first.

Attachment: s390-ia64-mips-sparc.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]