This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tuples] [patch] refactoring of tree_expr_nonzero_warnv_p

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: Rafael Espindola <espindola at google dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:03:46 -0500
Subject: Re: [tuples] [patch] refactoring of tree_expr_nonzero_warnv_p
References: <38a0d8450803040209gf52e35fh1f4d76fd5202d1bd@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000803040238m21e01f75s2da56a4a2f8c4441@mail.gmail.com> <47CD44E0.9080202@google.com> <84fc9c000803040551v554cf270we1ff2e10cb66045f@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/4/08 8:51 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:

Sounds like a good plan.  Maybe also separate constant foldings
(that would be also used by FEs directly) to a const-fold.c.  But that's
of course unrelated to your work here.

Yeah. We can do this in stages. I will start moving GIMPLE folders to gimple-fold-const.c soon.

Diego.

References:
- [tuples] [patch] refactoring of tree_expr_nonzero_warnv_p
  - From: Rafael Espindola
- Re: [tuples] [patch] refactoring of tree_expr_nonzero_warnv_p
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [tuples] [patch] refactoring of tree_expr_nonzero_warnv_p
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tuples] [patch] refactoring of tree_expr_nonzero_warnv_p
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]