This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][4.3] Deprecate -ftrapv

> int f(int a, int b) { return 0 * (a + b); }
> 
> get the potentially trapping arithmetic folded away.  If -ftrapv is to 
> have properly defined semantics, those must include trapping if (a + b) 
> overflows in the above code.

Why?  Is there any language that requires such semantics?
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]