This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PR 35232: Recent regression due to reload inheritance bug

On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:17:09PM +0000, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:28:02AM +0000, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >> OK, so in summary: if the reload patch stands the test of time on mainline,
> >> it'll be OK to backport to 4.3.1?
> >
> > That will depend on reload maintainer's (or GWP) decision.
> 
> Understood.  But these sort of things often need both the area maintainer
> and RM to sign off on them.  I was more asking from the RM point of view.
> (Specifically, I was worried that XFAILing the test might somehow stop
> the PR from meeting the branch criteria.)

No, XFAILing doesn't change anything on whether something is a regression or
not.  When 4.3 will be released, the 4.3 branch will be in the usual mode,
no RM approval will be needed.

	Jakub
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]