This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: PR 34415: dbr_schedule vs. uninitialised registers

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
To: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at nildram dot co dot uk>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 10:46:03 +0100
Subject: Re: RFA: PR 34415: dbr_schedule vs. uninitialised registers
References: <87tzmpzgtq.fsf@firetop.home> <200712141705.41529.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <87odcrf06s.fsf@firetop.home>

> gcc/
> 	PR rtl-optimization/34415
> 	* df.h (DF_LR_IN, DF_LR_OUT): Update comments.
> 	* resource.c (mark_target_live_regs): Use DF_LR_IN rather than
> 	df_get_live_in.  Don't handle pseudos.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> 	PR rtl-optimization/34415
> 	* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr34415.c: New test.

OK, thanks.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

References:
- RFA: PR 34415: dbr_schedule vs. uninitialised registers
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: RFA: PR 34415: dbr_schedule vs. uninitialised registers
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: RFA: PR 34415: dbr_schedule vs. uninitialised registers
  - From: Richard Sandiford

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]