This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH,vect] Committed ppc cost model options
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 10:15:53AM -0600, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> On Dec 7, 2007 6:29 AM, Jakub Jelinek <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Or, it makes sense and just tree-vectorizer.h mistakenly defines it to the
> > same field, then we need a new field (that's what the second patch does).
> This is what Harsha intended, and I think it is just a typo that she
> forgot to add a new field for LOOP_VINFO_NITERS_UNCHANGED. This
> should be different than LOOP_VINFO_NITERS as the value of
> LOOP_VINFO_NITERS is changed by vect_do_peeling_for_alignment.
Is the second patch ok for trunk then (provided bootstrap/regtest on