This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH,vect] Committed ppc cost model options


On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 10:15:53AM -0600, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> On Dec 7, 2007 6:29 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Or, it makes sense and just tree-vectorizer.h mistakenly defines it to the
> > same field, then we need a new field (that's what the second patch does).
> >
> 
> This is what Harsha intended, and I think it is just a typo that she
> forgot to add a new field for LOOP_VINFO_NITERS_UNCHANGED.  This
> should be different than LOOP_VINFO_NITERS as the value of
> LOOP_VINFO_NITERS is changed by vect_do_peeling_for_alignment.

Is the second patch ok for trunk then (provided bootstrap/regtest on
x86_64-linux succeeds)?

	Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]