This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [LTO][PATCH] Fix long double precision problem

From: "=?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62vHcp?=" <dougkwan at google dot com>
To: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo at google dot com>
Cc: "Kenneth Zadeck" <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>, "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, "Nathan Froyd" <froydnj at codesourcery dot com>, "Mark Mitchell" <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 08:27:51 -0800
Subject: Re: [LTO][PATCH] Fix long double precision problem
References: <498552560712042305h6aa6f4d8jfdc8e9031b522604@mail.gmail.com> <de8d50360712050252t7bfc791brc8e39f2a7ca2197d@mail.gmail.com> <47569FA0.5040308@naturalbridge.com> <4756BBEE.4080109@google.com>

Agree. I will change my patch and send it out when it's ready.

2007/12/5, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>:
> On 12/5/07 7:54 AM, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
>
> > is the right solution to just serialize the size and restore it from that?
>
> Unless there is already a target hook for doing this, I think it's
> safest to just serialize these bits.
>
>
> Diego.
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [LTO][PATCH] Fix long double precision problem
  - From: Andrew Pinski

References:
- [LTO][PATCH] Fix long double precision problem
  - From: =?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62vHcp?=
- Re: [LTO][PATCH] Fix long double precision problem
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [LTO][PATCH] Fix long double precision problem
  - From: Kenneth Zadeck
- Re: [LTO][PATCH] Fix long double precision problem
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]