This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

btest-gcc.sh patch ping and Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES


(CC list pruned and updated.)

On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 10:05:54PM +0000, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
> > Even though current mainline can build libgfortran, all tests fail for
> > simulator testing, and I'm not sure whether you could get it work for
> > bare-metal boards or not.

Richard, I don't know when you tested; either you're telling
history or you're more updated, see PR21185 track for my
datestamp.

>    It works on arm-unknown-elf, v850-unknown-elf and frv-unknown-elf:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-11/msg01428.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-11/msg01468.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-11/msg00427.html
>
>    Some work has been and is being done in this area:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21185
>
>    Hans, you showed gfortran results for cris-elf, but we don't seem to be
> building gfortran for the cris?

Only for two lame reasons, now that gfortran is expected to
build and test.

1 - it'll take much longer to regtest
2 - btest-gcc.sh isn't updated to cover fortran.
    Patch at <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-09/msg01710.html>.  Ping!

or three actually:
3 - not much real-world use for fortran on this target

brgds, H-P


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]