Re: libffi standalone

[Dalibor Topic <dalibor dot topic at googlemail dot com>]

Tom Tromey <tromey <at> redhat.com> writes:

> 
> >>>>> "Timothy" == Timothy Wall <twall <at> users.sf.net> writes:
> 
> Timothy> Before expending any effort to post a standalone build patch,
> Timothy> I'd like to gauge the interest in this.
> 
> I think it is worthwhile.
> 
> Currently I'm thinking this should be done in the standalone libffi
> repository.  We can import gcc libffi there periodically, and preserve
> the standalone build patches.
> 
> What do you think of that?
> 
> We can easily get you write access to the standalone libffi
> repository.  Email me off-list.

What would it take to cut a release from the standalone libffi repository?

cheers,
dalibor topic