This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC


On Nov 24, 2007, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Nov 24, 2007, Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1@t-online.de> wrote:
>> Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>> And then, despite the consensus that GCC must not generate different
>>> code with and without -g, the patch that fixes one such regression has
>>> been lingering for months, and the patch that introduced the
>>> regression hasn't been reverted either.

>> Pointers?

> Regression introduced here:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg01745.html

> first reported here:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg00127.html

> last proposed patch here:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg00608.html

I take it back that this patch wasn't approved.  Mark had approved it
on Nov 5, I didn't want to check it in before going on a trip and,
when I returned, I forgot about the approval because it was in an
unrelated thread.  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-11/msg00139.html

I'll shortly check in that one and a bunch of others that also got
approval but that I deferred until my return.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member         http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]