This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [lto] Add support for running execute.exp with -flto


William Maddox wrote:
> On 10/19/07, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com> wrote:
> 
>> I was wrong.  I got confused by my script that always puts -flto in
>> the gcc call.  The LTO behaviour is *only* done if -flto is given in
>> the final link command.
> 
> This is the specified behavior, and is "the right thing", as the ".o"
> files produced by LTO also contain ordinary object code, and could
> reasonably be linked in the normal way, without LTO.

Diego, for avoidance of doubt, I think you should feel free to commit
things on the LTO branch without approval.  If someone doesn't like
something, they'll shout. :-)

Thanks,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]