This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [lto] Add support for running execute.exp with -flto

From: "William Maddox" <maddox at google dot com>
To: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo at google dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:38:21 -0700
Subject: Re: [lto] Add support for running execute.exp with -flto
References: <b798aad50710191541n4fba133ek32cd990f76d31508@mail.gmail.com> <b798aad50710191550y98c9676g8414e910ef9b44d5@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/19/07, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com> wrote:

> I was wrong.  I got confused by my script that always puts -flto in
> the gcc call.  The LTO behaviour is *only* done if -flto is given in
> the final link command.

This is the specified behavior, and is "the right thing", as the ".o"
files produced by LTO also contain ordinary object code, and could
reasonably be linked in the normal way, without LTO.

--Bill

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lto] Add support for running execute.exp with -flto
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- [lto] Add support for running execute.exp with -flto
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [lto] Add support for running execute.exp with -flto
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]