This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: modified x86 ABI

From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
To: Mark Shinwell <shinwell at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, David Taylor <dtaylor at emc dot com>, "Darryl L. Miles" <darryl-mailinglists at netbauds dot net>, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, Seongbae Park (ëìë, ææå) <seongbae dot park at gmail dot com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:40:53 +0200
Subject: Re: modified x86 ABI
Openpgp: id=C272A126; url=http://www.suse.de/~aj/keys.txt
References: <5787cf470710230107m38d910cal42a140897d65d6f1@mail.gmail.com> <471DBD9B.2020600@codesourcery.com>

One interesting question to me is what is the ABI like compared to the
x86-64 ABI?  Did you just change the size of the types or did you change
others as well, e.g. calling conventions?  

Do you need new binutils for this?  A new C library?

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, Director Platform / openSUSE, aj@suse.de
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
   Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: modified x86 ABI
  - From: Mark Shinwell
- Re: modified x86 ABI
  - From: David Taylor

References:
- Re: modified x86 ABI
  - From: Uros Bizjak
- Re: modified x86 ABI
  - From: Mark Shinwell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]