This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix DCE REG_LIBCALL note moving from noop move insns (PR rtl-optimization/33644)


> The last time this came up, it was pretty much agreed that the main
> reason to still have libcalls was to allow dynamic TLS addresses
> (which involve calls) to be CSE-ed.  I don't know if this actually
> works as expected right now, I've never checked that.  

I'd expect this to be very similar, if not identical, to a call to
something like _muldi3.  Why isn't it?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]