This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Dorit Nuzman/Haifa/IBM wrote on 09/10/2007 11:24:22: > > > > Fix vectorizer testcases mainly to pass on SPU and 750cl. > > > > Tested on SPU and PowerPC. > > O.K. for mainline? > > > > Hi, > > please see a few comments below: > The updated patch is attached. > > (natural_alignment): Split into... > > (natural_alignment_32, natural_alignment_64): New. > > (alignment_reachable_for_double): Depend on natural_alignment_64. > > > > About the natural_alignment_32/natural_alignment_64 functions: I > would prefer if a testsuite maintainer could also take a look. The > idea is to differentiate between targets that guarantee natural > alignment for types whose size is 32-bit or less (presumably all > targets but 64-bit darwin), and targets that can also guarantee > natural alignment for types whose size is 64-bit or less (presumably > all 64-bit targets but darwin). The question is whether these two > functions indeed implement the above descriptions. (A separate > question is whether these descriptions are correct, but any > testsuite regressions will answer this question...). Ping? Thanks, Ira (See attached file: tests.txt)
Attachment:
tests.txt
Description: Text document
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |