This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix optimization regression in constant folder
On 10/11/07, Richard Kenner <email@example.com> wrote:
> > It's true that this is a different type from size_t, the user-visible
> > type. The latter is just a typedef for some unsigned integral type, and
> > might be wider than sizetype, and might not have other special
> > properties of sizetype, whatever those might be.
> No, I think it's required that it's the same size, and possibly signedness,
> as size_t, but they are very definitely different types, with different
I think it's required that it matches the size of pointers, in C speak
be intptr_t, not size_t.