This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH][RFC] Fix PR33724, fix PR19382 differently
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Which would be the following; testing in progress.
> Thanks, this would be nicer to Ada. :-)
> Btw, any particular reason why the new check uses TYPE_POINTER_TO? This field
> is a little awkward to deal with. Can't we keep using the old idiom from
> check_pointer_types_r, i.e. testing the pointed-to type instead?
I think there was a particular reason why I chose the other way, but
I can't remember right now. I'll think about it again.