This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Don't set DECL_IGNORED_P on a cdtor function
Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> The key issues are that (a) we have no source for these
>> compiler-generated functions, and (b) they don't correspond to anything
>> in the source program. If I say "step" off the end of a C++ "main", I
>> don't want to end up in one of these functions; I want to end up in the
>> first C++ destructor being called by them. That's the C++ view of the
>> world; these cdtor functions are just implementation details.
>> So, I think we should consider the issue closed, with Eric's patch.
> Your comment seems to imply that Geoff's patch should be reverted too. :-)
Yes, I do. (I hadn't realized it had been committed.)
Does anyone concur? Object?
(650) 331-3385 x713