This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Put scope blocks on a diet

From: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 07:53:30 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Put scope blocks on a diet
References: <20070724180235.GM24519@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <orlkcucny9.fsf@oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <ory7gtbkd9.fsf@oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20070806201102.GF4460@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <orprzw2kuk.fsf@free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <84fc9c000710031119q3a1672cep5c98a642aa1100cb@mail.gmail.com> <20071007223722.GH2688@kam.mff.cuni.cz>

Hi,

On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Jan Hubicka wrote:

> > 
> > In the long run, we should generate (and output) debug information
> > for types and declarations early and simply remember the DIE when
> > refering to it instead of keeping our hands on the types and decls
> > itself.
> 
> This seems to be bit dificult to implement given that inlining and other
> optimizations modify/build new types....

I certainly hope that middle-end transformation don't build many new 
types.  Actually I sure hope they build no new types at all, but I'll 
better not say none, you never know :)

Ciao,
Michael.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Put scope blocks on a diet
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- Re: Put scope blocks on a diet
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Put scope blocks on a diet
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Put scope blocks on a diet
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]