This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Don't set DECL_IGNORED_P on a cdtor function

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
Cc: Geoffrey Keating <gkeating at apple dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 18:05:48 -0400
Subject: Re: Don't set DECL_IGNORED_P on a cdtor function
References: <20071004212317.7FA2C7771263@geoffk5.apple.com> <20071004213557.GA30976@caradoc.them.org> <200710050000.32663.ebotcazou@adacore.com>

On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 12:00:32AM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > The lack of DWARF frame information sounds like the real bug.  Perhaps
> > in Eric's February changes on how DECL_IGNORED_P was handled for
> > functions?
> 
> If the user is supposed to able to set a breakpoint in the function, I don't 
> think that the function should have DECL_IGNORED_P on it.

It doesn't correspond to any source... well, you could argue it either
way.  Anyway, shouldn't we output frame information regardless of DECL_IGNORED_P?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Don't set DECL_IGNORED_P on a cdtor function
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- Don't set DECL_IGNORED_P on a cdtor function
  - From: Geoffrey Keating
- Re: Don't set DECL_IGNORED_P on a cdtor function
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Don't set DECL_IGNORED_P on a cdtor function
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]