This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Remove expand_body langhook

From: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: tromey at redhat dot com
Cc: "Jan Hubicka" <jh at suse dot cz>, "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>, "Mark Mitchell" <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:42:26 -0700
Subject: Re: Remove expand_body langhook
References: <20070909125433.GG30523@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <46E4421B.80902@codesourcery.com> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0709111640500.3761@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> <20070912071012.GE21969@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <m3d4wnznsj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

On 9/12/07, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
> How about we delete treelang?  It adds busy-work to otherwise
> straightforward patches, and AFAIK is not used anywhere.

Though I have to addmit, there have been only ~ 10 patches to treelang
this year.  And of those, all have been keeping treelang up and
running.  10 patches for 10 months is not bad to keep a small language
around.  Just saying that it is not really that big of busy work after
all.  In fact there was nothing needed to be done to support
POINTER_PLUS_EXPR in treelang which was cool in of itself.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Remove expand_body langhook
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- Remove expand_body langhook
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Remove expand_body langhook
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Remove expand_body langhook
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI
- Re: Remove expand_body langhook
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Remove expand_body langhook
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]