This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Remove expand_body langhook

Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> writes:
> 
> Jan> I forgot to test treelang, sorry.  I am testing attached patch I
> Jan> will commit as obvious
> 
> How about we delete treelang?  It adds busy-work to otherwise
> straightforward patches, and AFAIK is not used anywhere.

I second that suggestion.

Anybody want to argue to keep treelang?  Not just that it's a nice idea
to have a worked example of a minimal front end, but that it's actually
worth lugging it around?

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]