This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] gcc.target/i386/cmov4.c regressed but was still passing

From: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:12:19 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcc.target/i386/cmov4.c regressed but was still passing
References: <5787cf470708230310sa180771l71e3f13973e15ec3@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: bonzini at gnu dot org

Uros Bizjak wrote:

Hello!

I tested 4.1 and it works there. I don't have a 4.2 compiler at hand. I'll file the
bugreport soon; I'd rather avoid *X*FAIL because it is a regression, I'd rather see a
real FAIL in the logs.

4.2 works OK and produces:

OK, it seems like there's consensus that, for a 4.3 regression, it's best to not XFAIL it. I'll file the report soon.

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] gcc.target/i386/cmov4.c regressed but was still passing
  - From: Uros Bizjak

References:
- Re: [PATCH] gcc.target/i386/cmov4.c regressed but was still passing
  - From: Uros Bizjak

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]