This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH]: fix bootstrap for solaris2 cc, ?: with different operand struct const-ness


On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Joseph S. Myers wrote:

> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
>
> > My question: is the solaris compiler wrong to complain about this,
> > is GCC wrong to silently accept it, or is this some gray area of the
> > standard where implementations are free to choose either route?
>
> lvalue-to-rvalue conversion loses the const qualification, so by the time
> expressions are operands of ? : they don't have qualified type any more.

Well solaris cc apparently isn't losing the const-ness.

So to be clear I take your statement to mean this is a solaris cc bug?

		--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi			ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]