This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [c++ patch] Fix PRs 30849/30850/30851
Lee Millward wrote:
On 7/22/07, Nathan Sidwell <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Why not just have cp_parser_asm_operand_list return error_mark_node in the face
of any bogus operand? (with suitable operand eating in that case)?
The attached patch implements this suggestion by modifying
cp_parser_asm_operand_list to track whether any of the operands are
invalid and to return error_mark_node in that case, adjusting the
checks in cp_parser_asm_definition accordingly.
Bootstrapped and regression tested with no new failures on
i686-pc-linux-gnu. Ok to apply?
Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery
email@example.com :: http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk