[PATCH] Wrong coverage attribution.

["Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)" <seongbae dot park at gmail dot com>]

Hi,

gcc/ChangeLog:
2007-07-26  Seongbae Park  <seongbae.park@gmail.com>

       * tree-eh.c (lower_try_finally_onedest): Reset the locus of moved goto.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2007-07-26  Seongbae Park  <seongbae.park@gmail.com>

       * lib/gcov.exp (verify-lines): Recognize - and # as possible count.
       * g++.dg/gcov/gcov-4.C: New test.


Attached patch fixes the problem shown in the testcase
- this testcase fails in the current mainline
because of GOTO moved to a different block during eh lowering.

Bootstrap and regtest are in progress.
If all tests look clean,
ok for mainline and 4.2 branch ?
--
#pragma ident "Seongbae Park, compiler, http://seongbae.blogspot.com";

Index: gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/gcov/gcov-4.C
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/gcov/gcov-4.C	(revision 0)
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/gcov/gcov-4.C	(revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+/* Check that execution counts and branch probabilities for various C
+   constructs are reported correctly by gcov. */
+
+#include <stdio.h>
+
+/* { dg-options "-fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage -fno-exceptions" } */
+/* { dg-do run { target native } } */
+
+class foo {
+public:
+  foo() { printf("foo()\n"); };
+  ~foo() { printf("~foo()\n"); };
+  void method(void) { printf("method()\n"); }; 
+};
+
+int func(int i, int j) __attribute__((noinline));
+
+int func(int i, int j){
+  if (j) {
+    printf("unreachable\n");
+    return 3;
+  }
+
+  foo f;
+
+  if (i == 1) {
+    f.method();
+    f.method();
+  } else {
+    f.method();
+    printf("unreachable\n");
+    return 2;        /* count(#####) */
+  }
+  f.method();
+  return 0;
+}
+
+int main() {
+  return func(1, 0);
+}
+/* { dg-final { run-gcov gcov-4.C } } */
Index: gcc/testsuite/lib/gcov.exp
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/lib/gcov.exp	(revision 126963)
+++ gcc/testsuite/lib/gcov.exp	(working copy)
@@ -42,7 +42,9 @@ proc verify-lines { testcase file } {
     set failed 0
     set fd [open $file r]
     while { [gets $fd line] >= 0 } {
-	if [regexp "^ *(\[^:]*): *(\[0-9\]+):.*count\\((\[0-9\]+)\\)" \
+        # We want to match both "-" and "#####" as count as well as numbers,
+        # since we want to detect lines that shouldn't be marked as covered.
+	if [regexp "^ *(\[^:]*): *(\[0-9\\-#]+):.*count\\((\[0-9\\-#]+)\\)" \
 		"$line" all is n shouldbe] {
 	    if { $is == "" } {
 		fail "$n:no data available for this line"
Index: gcc/tree-eh.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/tree-eh.c	(revision 126963)
+++ gcc/tree-eh.c	(working copy)
@@ -999,6 +999,9 @@ lower_try_finally_onedest (struct leh_st
 	}
     }
 
+  /* Reset the locus of the goto since we're moving 
+     goto to a different block which might be on a different line. */
+  SET_EXPR_LOCUS (tf->goto_queue[0].cont_stmt, NULL);
   append_to_statement_list (tf->goto_queue[0].cont_stmt, tf->top_p);
   maybe_record_in_goto_queue (state, tf->goto_queue[0].cont_stmt);
 }