This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: eliminate warnings from c-opts.c

From: Ben Elliston <bje at au1 dot ibm dot com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:57:50 +1000
Subject: Re: PATCH: eliminate warnings from c-opts.c
References: <1185053238.32204.12.camel@localhost> <20070725111716.GA7240@caradoc.them.org>

On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 07:17 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> > Unless I'm mistaken, it is done this way so that GCC sources can include
> > an independently named "tm_p.h" without needing to know the name of the
> > <machine>-protos.h header.  However, this seems too obvious, so I
> > suspect I'm wrong.  :-)
> 
> I think the question is relative to tm.h (and it has something to do
> with which files include one and not the other).

OK, so let's ignore the doc change I proposed.  Is the patch to
eliminate the warning going about it the right way?

Cheers, Ben

References:
- PATCH: eliminate warnings from c-opts.c
  - From: Ben Elliston
- Re: PATCH: eliminate warnings from c-opts.c
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]