This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tuples] fix gimplify_return_expr buglet

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
To: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
Cc: amacleod at redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 08:19:41 -0400
Subject: Re: [tuples] fix gimplify_return_expr buglet
References: <20070720174814.GA20788@redhat.com> <46A10A1E.3090006@google.com> <20070720193120.GA23342@redhat.com>

On 7/20/07 3:31 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:

> 	if (a > 3)
> 		return 69;
> 
> ...is being generated correctly.  We make a GIMPLE_ASSIGN tuple and set
> everything up correctly.  What testcase did you have in mind?

That's the thing.  We should *not* generate the GIMPLE_ASSIGN.  The
return operand should just be the CONST_INT 69. I have to look at the
gimplifier when I get back.

References:
- [tuples] fix gimplify_return_expr buglet
  - From: Aldy Hernandez
- Re: [tuples] fix gimplify_return_expr buglet
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tuples] fix gimplify_return_expr buglet
  - From: Aldy Hernandez

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]