This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Make more use of register insv and ext*v expanders


Hi,

On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Richard Sandiford wrote:

> ...on targets that also have limited memory expanders.
> 
> The insv, extv and extzv patterns can ask for the structure operand
> to be a register, a memory, or either.  If the predicate rejects a
> memory operand, store_bit_field and extract_bit_field try using a
> register operand instead.

Hmm, I already wanted to get the patch reverted I mentioned here:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg01169.html

The problem is that this would conflict with your patch and since you 
already work in this area I hope you can give some help how to resolve 
this. :)
Any idea how I can get gcc again to use and/or instructions for constant 
single-bit bitfields instead of bitfield instructions? Should I just 
reject this in the expander or is there something better?

bye, Roman


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]