This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][RFC] Another approach to fixing "bad" inlining


On Jul 10, 2007, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> wrote:

> We ran into the same problem a few years ago with C functions casted to 
> incompatible function types.  Inlining in this case led to ICEs in the RTL 
> expander.  We "solved" the problem by generating an explicit trap in lieu
> of the bogus function call:

FWIW, issuing a warning and replacing the function call with a trap
sounds like a better choice than leaving the argument uninitialized to
me.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member         http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]