On Sun, 8 Jul 2007, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On 7/8/07, Kaveh R. GHAZI <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> > PING.
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-06/msg01292.html
> >
> > This patch WILL generate incorrect code for certain subnormal numbers.
> > However that problem is fixed by my "type generic" builtins patch here:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg00691.html
> >
> > There's nothing wrong with this patch per se, so it can be reviewed now
> > with the understanding that I'll apply it after the fix above and switch
> > it's attributes to include "type generic".
>
> Same as for the other. The builtin should be C99_C90RES (if it is reserved
> by C90). I'm not sure why all of the comparison ones are not - Joseph?
>
> Otherwise ok with documentation in extend.texi.
Here is the "isnormal" patch updated with documentation and attribute
"type generic". Left it as DEF_GCC as per other messages.
Ok for mainline?