This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch, fortran] PR24784, PR28004 - about unused variables

From: Daniel Franke <franke dot daniel at gmail dot com>
To: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at verizon dot net>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 00:43:47 +0200
Subject: Re: [patch, fortran] PR24784, PR28004 - about unused variables
References: <200707040757.51844.franke.daniel@gmail.com> <84fc9c000707040128hf34d307ka344e2efe1f468ec@mail.gmail.com> <469165B8.8020406@verizon.net>

On Monday 09 July 2007 00:31:20 Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
> > The function.c bits are ok.  But you need a bootstrap & regtest for all
> > default languages if you touch a middle-end part, so please make sure 
> > that there are no regressions for those.
>
> After Richards request, Fortran side is OK as well.

I did a bootstrap and regtest on all default languages and tried to compare 
against results from gcc-testresults. There shouldn't be any regressions ...

Committed as r126471.

References:
- [patch, fortran] PR24784, PR28004 - about unused variables
  - From: Daniel Franke
- Re: [patch, fortran] PR24784, PR28004 - about unused variables
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [patch, fortran] PR24784, PR28004 - about unused variables
  - From: Jerry DeLisle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]