Re: [RFA:] fix lack of #ifdef HAVE_C99_RUNTIME in builtins-20.c and elsewhere

[Geoff Keating <geoffk at apple dot com>]

On 05/07/2007, at 6:01 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:

> > From: Geoff Keating <geoffk@apple.com>
> > Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 17:39:08 -0700
>
> > On 05/07/2007, at 5:19 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > > > > +proc check_effective_target_c99_math { } {
>
> > I agree with Kaveh here; in each of these cases what you want to do  
> > is
> > to #include builtins-config.h and add options lines as
> > appropriate.
>
> No, I *don't* want to do that *only* and I already mentioned
> why: the tests *besides* builtins-20; to wit builtins-59.c,
> builtins-61.c and builtins-62.c, are performed by grepping dump
> files, and that can't be helped by an include and stuff #ifdef'd
> out.  That only helps builtins-20.c.  Those tests need a
> dejagnu-test way to be skipped, and that way is
> check_effective_target_c99_math.

Well, that makes sense; but then can you arrange for  
check_effective_target_c99_math to distinguish between the case of "I  
included builtins-config.h and it said there were no C99 functions"  
and "builtins-config.h says I have a testsuite error"?