This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] PR 32475 stack setup code being deleted.

From: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch>
To: "Seongbae Park (ëìë, ææå)" <seongbae dot park at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:05:56 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR 32475 stack setup code being deleted.
References: <ab3a61990707031620g591f9328w55ce463ac7e03743@mail.gmail.com> <468B43DF.1010204@lu.unisi.ch> <ab3a61990707040938s17d9feeen9942915f1985d907@mail.gmail.com> <468BE2C9.1070701@lu.unisi.ch> <ab3a61990707041155v5dc007fas39c69b4d9ec4256e@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: bonzini at gnu dot org

I don't see any reason not to keep the chain correct.
Also, note that this will create less refs than Kenny's proposed patch,
as there are presumably less insns that update SP
than MEM_LOAD/MEM_STORE that references hard frame pointer.

Ok then.

Paolo

References:
- [PATCH] PR 32475 stack setup code being deleted.
  - From: Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
- Re: [PATCH] PR 32475 stack setup code being deleted.
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [PATCH] PR 32475 stack setup code being deleted.
  - From: Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
- Re: [PATCH] PR 32475 stack setup code being deleted.
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [PATCH] PR 32475 stack setup code being deleted.
  - From: Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]