This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
While looking into the gzip performance regression, I noticed that IV-opts was not taking into account in two places POINTER_PLUS_EXPR. The problem is IV-OPTs really needs to look at POINTER_PLUS_EXPR a bit more. This makes IV-OPTS does that and the IV selection is better for the inner loops in deflact.c in gzip. I have not done a full performance analysis to double check that this speeds up gzip but as mentioned before I looked into deflact.c and it improved the loops there. OK? Bootstrapped and tested on i686-linux-gnu with no regression. Thanks, Andrew Pinski * tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (strip_offset_1): Treat POINTER_PLUS_EXPR like PLUS_EXPR. (rewrite_use_nonlinear_expr): Likewise.
Attachment:
fixivopts.diff.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |