This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] Unifying the "interrupt" attribute (Was: m68k: Accept "interrupt" attribute)

From: Bernardo Innocenti <bernie at codewiz dot org>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Kazu Hirata <kazu at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, law at redhat dot com, schwab at suse dot de
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:37:47 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch] Unifying the "interrupt" attribute (Was: m68k: Accept "interrupt" attribute)
References: <200706011921.l51JLoon024855@sparrowhawk.codesourcery.com> <4676E97D.7060207@codewiz.org> <46770A9E.4070308@codesourcery.com> <46781C55.2040706@codewiz.org> <46781CED.2050502@codewiz.org> <46781F35.3090402@codesourcery.com>

Mark Mitchell wrote:

So, I'd suggest that we accept "interrupt" everywhere.


I'm adding a note to my todo list to prepare a patch to do this,
but I'm not hoping to have any spare time over the next days.

Anybody please feel free to beat me on time.

--
  // Bernardo Innocenti
\X/  http://www.codewiz.org/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] Unifying the "interrupt" attribute (Was: m68k: Accept "interrupt" attribute)
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- [patch] m68k: Accept "interrupt" attribute.
  - From: Kazu Hirata
- Re: [patch] m68k: Accept "interrupt" attribute.
  - From: Bernardo Innocenti
- Re: [patch] m68k: Accept "interrupt" attribute.
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [patch] m68k: Accept "interrupt" attribute.
  - From: Bernardo Innocenti
- Re: [patch] m68k: Accept "interrupt" attribute.
  - From: Bernardo Innocenti
- Re: [patch] m68k: Accept "interrupt" attribute.
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]