This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: tests for compiler (non-)limits
- From: "Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
- To: "'Roman Zippel'" <zippel at linux-m68k dot org>
- Cc: "'Geoffrey Keating'" <geoffk at apple dot com>, "'Richard Guenther'" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, "'gcc-patches List'" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:08:08 +0100
- Subject: RE: tests for compiler (non-)limits
- References: <20070424030219.043415E2537F@geoffk5.apple.com> <84fc9c000705301421u726aaa83v7ed9e47978c69766@mail.gmail.com> <4329F73D-7A6E-4044-8E6F-F5FBC365F9BB@apple.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706182112270.1820@scrub.home> <049801c7b1fc$5f0cae50$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706190227400.1817@scrub.home>
On 19 June 2007 01:33, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Dave Korn wrote:
>
>> It may be down to stack space limits rather than overall heap or swap
>> space.
>
> In my case it doesn't look like this. I added some swap and reran the
> tests and this time it suceeds.
> The stack limit is 8MB and that doesn't seem to be a problem, I watched
> the test via top and cc1 grew to 800MB...
> Does one really need now that much space to run the tests?
Well, only the limits tests, but after all the whole idea is to really push
the envelope...
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....